Sunday, November 16, 2008

Bond Becomes a Leftist

Juan Cole doesn't normally do movie reviews, but he has an interesting analysis of the new James Bond film in "A Quantum of Anti-Imperialism."

Some excerpts:

The reviews of director Mark Forster's "Quantum of Solace" have complained about the film's hectic pace (reminiscent of Doug Liman's and Paul Greengrass's Bourne thrillers), about the humorlessness of Daniel Craig's Bond, and even about the squalid surroundings, so unlike Monaco and Prague, in which the film is set (with many scenes in Haiti and Bolivia). They have missed the most remarkable departure of all. Forster presents us with a new phenomenon in the James Bond films, a Bond at odds with the United States, who risks his career to save Evo Morales's leftist regime in Bolivia from being overthrown by a General Medrano, who is helped by the CIA and a private mercenary organization called Quantum.

. . . .

The present film takes, to say the least, a different view of popular movements of the left. [Evo] Morales is not mentioned in the film, but his movement was in the headlines while "Casino Royale" was being shot, as he challenged the old "white" elite and was denounced by the US ambassador as an "Andean Bin Laden" and his peasant followers (many of them of largely native stock) as "Taliban." Morales's nationalization of Bolivia's petroleum and natural gas and his redistribution of wealth from the wealthy elite to villagers were among the policies drawing the ire of George W. Bush and his cronies.

If Morales is not mentioned, Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti is. The villain, Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) remarks that while Aristide was president 2001-2004, he raised the minimum wage from 25 cents an hour to a dollar an hour. It was, he said, little enough, but caused the corporations that benefited from cheap Haitian labor to mobilize to have Aristide removed. (Aristide himself maintained that US and Canadian intelligence connived with officers at the coup against him and kidnapped him, taking him to southern Africa.) The Left analysis of American imperialism in the Western hemisphere is put in the mouth, not of a worker or ideologue, but rather of the collaborator in capitalist exploitation of America's poor neighbors. Aristide's story is a clear parallelism for the fate the CIA and Quantum are depicted as plotting for Morales.

Note that director Mark Forster's father was from conservative Bavaria, and that the family was forced to relocate to Davos in Switzerland because they were targeted by the radical Baader-Meinhoff gang after the father became wealthy on selling his pharmaceutical company. Forster's previous film, "The Kite-Runner," sympathized with the Afghans oppressed by the Soviet invasion and even shows one character refusing to be treated by a Russian-American physician. That is, Forster is no glib Third-Worldist. He and his screenwriters are simply performing the work of the intellectual, interrogating the way the wealthy and powerful in the Bush era casually overthrew (or tried to overthrow) foreign governments in the global south to get at the resources they coveted.

. . . .

Craig's Bond is an intimation of the sort of Britain that could have been, if Tony Blair had stood up to Bush and refused to be dragged into an illegal war of choice, and into other actions and policies that profoundly contradicted the principles on which the Labour Party had been founded (and you could imagine Craig's Bond voting for Old Labour, while Flemings's was obviously a Tory). In a way, this Bond stands in for Clare Short, who resigned as a cabinet minister from Blair's government in 2003 over the illegitimacy of the Iraq War.

It is a sad state of affairs that Bush's America now appears in a Bond film in rather the same light as Brezhnev's Soviet Union used to. One can only hope that President Barack Obama can adopt the sort of policies that can get Bond back on our side.
Hey, if A.O. Scott (New York Times) panned the film, it must have something going for it.

9 comments:

Liam said...

I saw that on Juan Cole today as well. We're definitely going next weekend -- IPAO is a huge Daniel Craig fan.

cowboyangel said...

Yeah, I thought Craig was great in Casino Royale. We'll probably go see it in the next couple of weeks.

Have you guys seen him as Ted Hughes in the Sylvia Plath movie?

Liam said...

No, I didn't even hear about that movie. Who played Sylvia?

cowboyangel said...

Gwyneth Paltrow. I've been too scared to watch it.

Here's a scene with Craig as Hughes.

crystal said...

I still haven't seen this Bond. It's not the first time Bond was on the side of the left, though. In The Living Daylights, he helped the Mujahideen in Afghanistan.

cowboyangel said...

Crystal,

If you like Connery as Bond, I recommend Craig in Casino Royale. They're not the same, obviously, and Connery remains my favorite, but Craig brings back something that Sean had in those early films.

I wouldn't say that helping the Muhajideen would place one on the left. They were fighting a Marxist government installed by the Soviet Union. Then, of course, they fought the Soviets themselves. They were backed by Ronald Reagan and the CIA. And, most importantly, they had Rambo on their side (Rambo III.) And Rambo ain't no damn liberal leftist! :-)

crystal said...

Yeah, I guessyou're right about the Afghan rebels.

My sister saw the movie last night and liked it a lot.

My favorite Bond was Timothy Dalton - sadly, he only did 2, I think.

Jeff said...

I only saw part of Casino Royale. This Bond is a little too personally rough, from what I saw. A little too "Steven Seagal" in the way he inflicts pain and mayhem. Connery, while still a roughneck, was a tad more subtle, if you know what I mean. Did they manage to fit in the old Herb Alpert song (Casino Royale) at all? That was one of my favorite tunes when I was a kid.

I don't mind him being a lefty, as long as he still drives an Aston Martin DBS. If he ever switches to a Volvo, or a Kia, or a Prius, or a frigging Smartcar, then I'll have a problem.

cowboyangel said...

I don't mind him being a lefty, as long as he still drives an Aston Martin DBS. If he ever switches to a Volvo, or a Kia, or a Prius, or a frigging Smartcar, then I'll have a problem.

Uh-oh. I know he drove a rental car in Casino Royale, and seems I read he was driving a hybrid at some point in the new film. Though, heaven forbid, not a Smartcar.